WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen and Firewalling

To: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen and Firewalling
From: Sam Johnston <samjie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 01:49:30 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:49:21 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UCoki9Y0t3D+F4oSr5cgA1kZ7qGA2XCe3PVXu5sZ6IaQp+jJxN3m8K5YubOAT9mSfuN/20u963kG0UqW8gzPHbQzy5WybTDlR9+ktP+CA7IlFh2uu2WS5emeog5eD3xIkskO+fe6emNCdxDs9J4YevdRydg09NPzvmX67qEdrd0=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504171957100.13054@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <eda77ff8050417163077a7c5aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504171957100.13054@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Sam Johnston <samjie@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Rik,

I've just worked out why my recompiling failed before - needed to
specify ARCH=xen ala:

make ARCH=xen menuconfig

It would be good to see netfilter included by default in domU kernels
in future releases, unless there's a reasonable reason not to. I see
it was just added to dom0 recently by iap10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2005-01-29 22:20:09+00:00, iap10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Add iptables modules to the default xen0 kernel, and add example
configuration files for a NAT setup.

Sam

On 4/18/05, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Sam Johnston wrote:
> 
> > Is there a reason for this? Is simply doing a make menuconfig inside
> > linux-2.6.10-xenU and setting the requisite options sufficient?
> 
> Yes, reconfiguring and recompiling is enough.
> 
> --
> "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
> Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
> by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>