On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Gerd Knorr wrote:
> I think we should have our own xd virtual block devices for xen and
> use them by default. It's cleaner, and probably also has less
> problems when using virtual disks and iSCSI at the same time ;)
>
> Using hd/sd instead probably is a useful option in some cases, I
> wouldn't drop that altogether, but only use that if the user
> explicitly asks for it.
Or, implement a xen scsi host driver, that acts like a real scsi host
controller, but instead imports virtual blocks. This seems like the best of
both worlds.
Note, this is not a overlay system like is done currently, nor is it a block
driver.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|