xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen, tools/python/xen: pincpu support, vcpus, ad
> Yeah, I think we should add something that better shows the available
> resources. Currently the total number of Physical CPUs a system has
> isn't really available in an obvious location.
xm info lists this as "packages", I think.
If the enumeration is done in a standardised way then it's possible to work
out in userspace what CPU id is where but it's not at all obvious to the user
right now. Would definitely be good for the management tools to give more
information to the user on this stuff.
Cheers,
Mark
> > such as "xm pincpu-show" and "xm pincpu-show-details" for a more verbose
> > listing
>
> What would these look like?
>
> > Then the next step would be creating some helper functions "xm
> > pincpu-add" so you could add a cpu to
> >
> >
> > a domain, or "xm pincpu-move" to move a cpu from one domain to another.
> > In addition you could have
> >
> > "xm pincpu-lock"/"xm pincpu-unlock" which would only allow one single
> > domain to access that cpu.
>
> I think the mapping that Ian mentioned was needed for load-balancing
> would achieve that, but we certainly could create an interface wrapper,
> like lock/unlock that was translated into the correct mapping command.
>
> > I am just thinking that maybe if you detail (if you have already not
> > done so) what you want the end result to
> > be, than it might be easier to figure out how to implement the lower
> > level functions more efficiently.
>
> No, this is good things to be talking about. The goal of this patch was
> to allow us to pin VCPUs mainly so we can test space-sharing versus
> time-sharing of VCPUs. That is, if we have a 4-way SMP box, with two
> domUs, each with four VCPUs, what is the perf difference between domUs each
> getting 2 physical cpus to run their 4 VCPUs versus domUs having access
> to all 4 physical cpus on which to run their 4 VCPUs.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Previous by Date: |
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Guest boot loader support [1/2], Ian Pratt |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Xen-devel] grant_tables.c / domain BIGLOCK anomaly, Vincent Hanquez |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen, tools/python/xen: pincpu support, vcpus, add vcpu to cpu map, Ryan Harper |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen, tools/python/xen: pincpu support, vcpus, add vcpu to cpu map, Sam Gill |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|