|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers
So domUs have to have grant table support enabled if dom0 does?
-Kip
On 4/13/05, Christopher Clark <christopher.w.clark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Anthony
>
> First off, hands up: this was my code and I just didn't get around to
> sending the mail to the list as I had enough to deal with relocating
> from the UK to the US last week. The code was, however, tested under
> load and working fine, and I did consider it to be ready for wider
> testing in unstable.
>
> The machines you can't get to start domUs, and symptom of not finding
> the root filesystem is exactly what you'd see if your dom0 and domU
> configs don't match; either both or neither need to be using grant
> tables for transport. Your other issues will need more investigation,
> and a reproducable scenario would be extremely helpful indeed.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christopher
>
>
> On 4/13/05, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ian Pratt wrote:
> >
> > >OK, that's news to us - we haven't seen any problems.
> > >
> > >It's been tested with dd's and kernel builds, and wasn't expected to be
> > >a particularly dangerous change.
> > >
> > >How you confirmed that disabling the option fixes your problems? Can you
> > >give a simple recipe to provoke problems?
> > >
> > We've had three different systems lose the ability to start domUs.
> > Disabling VBD grant tables fixed the problem. The best reproducable
> > example we have is default config on a domU from today's xen-unstable
> > snapshot. /dev/console is not accessible and no valid root is found.
> >
> > In my own case, it was working fairly well and then it just stopped
> > working. It would die mid-way through boot. Again, disabling VBD
> > grant-tables fixed the problem. I'm going to look into the problem this
> > evening and see if I can get you guys a more reproducable scenario.
> >
> > >It doesn't seem to be destablizing, at least for us. Possibly there's
> > >been some feature interaction with later checkins.
> > >
> > >
> > Possibly.
> >
> > >Anyone using the unstable tree should be reading the changelog
> > >closely...
> > >
> > >
> > I agree. I do, but I don't think a lot of people do. I'm not trying to
> > give you guys more work to do :-) Just a quick note to xen-devel would
> > suffice (if you've got an extra second).
> >
> > Thanks Ian,
> >
> > Regards,
> > Anthony Liguori
> >
> > >Ian
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Anthony Liguori
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Christopher Clark
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers,
Kip Macy <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Anthony Liguori
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Christopher Clark
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Christopher Clark
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Kip Macy
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Ryan Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Kip Macy
- Re: [Xen-devel] Unstableness in grant table block drivers, Ryan Harper
|
|
|
|
|