My explanation was a bit off (off like driving off a cliff),
The problem is that GCC4 is seeing is that variable such as frame (in
grant_table.c) is passed into a function without initialization. Again
for the variable sl1mfn (in shadow.c) does the same thing. So really
the patches should be:
Signed-off-by: Jerone Young <jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- xen/common/grant_table.c.old 2005-04-11 14:41:49.000000000
-0500
+++ xen/common/grant_table.c 2005-04-11 14:42:30.000000000 -0500
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ __gnttab_map_grant_ref(
struct exec_domain *led;
u16 dev_hst_ro_flags;
int handle;
- unsigned long frame, host_virt_addr;
+ unsigned long frame = 0, host_virt_addr;
int rc;
/* Returns 0 if TLB flush / invalidate required by caller.
--- xen/arch/x86/shadow.c.old 2005-04-11 14:38:51.000000000 -0500
+++ xen/arch/x86/shadow.c 2005-04-11 14:37:11.000000000 -0500
@@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ static inline unsigned long
shadow_make_snapshot(
struct domain *d, unsigned long gpfn, unsigned long gmfn)
{
- unsigned long smfn, sl1mfn;
+ unsigned long smfn, sl1mfn = 0;
void *original, *snapshot;
u32 min_max = 0;
int min, max, length;
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 19:57 +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > These patches initialize unsigned longs that are used in xen.
> > GCC4 complains about using unsigned longs that are not
> > initialized before use.
>
> Are any of these actually bug fixes, or simply work arrounds for some
> bizzare ggc4 behaviour?
>
> Ian
>
--
Jerone Young
IBM Linux Technology Center
jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx
512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home