RE: [Xen-devel] Badness in local_bh_enable

To:	"Nick Craig-Wood" <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] Badness in local_bh_enable
From:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:19:30 +0100
Cc:	Nicholas Lee <nic-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Mon, 11 Apr 2005 11:19:25 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcU+hytWvytQ26xRTl6IvnlTugqNwwAAOx8g
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Badness in local_bh_enable

> Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140  
> [<c011fb12>] local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90  [<c031fcfd>] 
> skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2d0  [<c016ac5c>] __pollwait+0x8c/0xd0  
> [<c0360d3a>] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160  [<c031af49>] 
> sock_poll+0x29/0x40  [<c016b635>] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0  
> [<c016b6aa>] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0  [<c016b871>] 
> sys_poll+0x161/0x240  [<c011f14c>] sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90 
>  [<c016abd0>] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0  [<c0109758>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

This only happened when you had two virtual NICs enabled on a domU,
right?

It's on the list of issues to try and reproduce and investigate when we
get a chance. Having further reports that the problem goes away with
just a single NIC would be useful.

Ian  

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Badness in local_bh_enable