|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144
On 8 Apr 2005, at 06:12, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
There are only four changesets between 1.1774 and 1.1777, and of
course one of them
is huge -- the 2.6.11 merge. Also, the objdump didn't tell me
anything useful. I
have the objdump and the stack trace if anyone wants them. I think
I'm at the end of
my abilities to narrow it down any further.
See Ian's email also, but this definitely looks like new start-of-day
code in 2.6.11 that needs fixing for running on Xen. If you can get a
stack backtrace for Linux, or some printk output (Ian's email explains
how to do both) then we can try narrowing down further.
I'm surprised it fails on your Xeon system but not ours. :-(
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, Bin Ren
- Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, Christopher S. Aker
- BK question Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, Adam Heath
- Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, Chris Wright
- Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, Christopher S. Aker
- Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, Bin Ren
- Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, M.A. Williamson
- Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, Christopher S. Aker
- Re: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144,
Keir Fraser <=
RE: [Xen-devel] BUG at domain.c:144, Ian Pratt
|
|
|
|
|