|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c
> > It's not actually a security problem, but using mfns is a bit ugly.
> >
> I mean for a full-virtualization domain, if the guest can map
> any mfn to its pfn, it will not be secure.
It can't unless the fully virtualized domain is fully privileged, which
it shouldn't be.
> I have a quick look at the grant table, Is the main point
> that put the mfn to the table and get an id, and then give
> other domain an id, so the other domain is allowed to map that mfn?
Yes, that's how it works.
Thanks,
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c, Ling, Xiaofeng
- RE: [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c, Ling, Xiaofeng
- RE: [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c, Ling, Xiaofeng
- RE: [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c, Ling, Xiaofeng
- RE: [Xen-devel] problem with netfront.c,
Ian Pratt <=
|
|
|
|
|