WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.

To: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.
From: Cédric Schieli <cedric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 12:36:45 +0200
Cc: Xen development list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kurt Garloff <garloff@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Theurer <habanero@xxxxxxxxxx>, Philip R Auld <pauld@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Vincent Hanquez <tab@xxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxx>, Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 10:37:43 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E39AF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E39AF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I've just tried with latest testing tree DomO and DomU and got same
results.

Le samedi 02 avril 2005 à 00:22 +0100, Ian Pratt a écrit :
>  There have been some changes to the frontend driver too: you might want to 
> try using the 2.0-testing kernel in domU too.
> 
> Also, a really nasty CPU performance bug got fixed earlier this evening, so 
> you should make sure you have the latest tree.
> 
> Ian
> 
> > > I just ran again, and for some reason it looks fine now...  
> > I have no 
> > > idea what I did to get the lower numbers initially, perhaps an 
> > > inadvertant IO scheduler change.  Service commit times are 
> > .28ms and I 
> > > can drive ~58MB/sec with just 16k requests on xen0.  I'll 
> > do some more 
> > > tests to get a more consistent picture.
> > > 
> > 
> > I still experience bad performance in domU with latest 
> > xen-testing dom0.
> > 
> > Here's my setup :
> > 
> > Xen : 2.0.5
> > Dom0 : 2.6.11-xen-testing (20050401 ~22h CEST) running Debian 
> > Sarge DomU : 2.6.10-xen-2.0.5 (8G LVM backed VBDs exported as 
> > hda1) running Gentoo Processor : AthlonXP 1800+ Chipset : VIA 
> > KT600 Drive : Seagate ST380013AS 80G SATA
> > 
> > And my results :
> > 
> > Dom0 : 51 MB/s
> > DomU : 36 MB/s
> > 
> > I've tried with request sizes from 128k to 1024k reading 
> > entire volume and obtained always same results.
> > Changing the scheduler on Dom0 and/or DomU doesn't change anything.
> > 
> > I can give you more info if nedded.
> > 
> > --
> > Cédric Schieli
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel