WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?

To: Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Stable Release policy?
From: Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:03:03 +1200
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:03:10 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=JDn/llCMi7pPj2WJPLvF9hEov/NW+8Wm4uSp5KW8T42gh12Nx+XhlJ9hU+QxsWOnD87TbsxgIkS/HZpWTvKmXp/59S76JpqHL7U+eYPhPdaw9tK9jNS7m7w62pLlJvGeTLy/KHVQAKhmOt4QSqtpuRov8B6rUMgd63NmJolc7GM=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200503292233.11389.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E390D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200503292233.11389.mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:33:11 +0100, Mark Williamson
<mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Have you tried just applying them?  The only problematic changes are ones
> under arch/i386.

[nic@stateless:/usr/src/linux-2.6.11.6] patch -p1 -s  <
../xen/xen-2.0.bk/patch-2.6.10-xen0
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file include/linux/skbuff.h.rej
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Makefile.rej

>From the looks of include/linux/skbuff.h it should be fine to ignore
skbuff.h.rej.

I assume that everything else should be fine.

Nicholas

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>