RE: [Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance.

To:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "peter bier" <peter_bier@xxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance.
From:	"Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:19:38 +0100
Delivery-date:	Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:19:49 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcU0VGRzbyp7PVQUTGSo4lNq3twk0gAC/TcwAAGQ6mA=
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance.

> Would you mind repeating these experiments with a 2.4 dom0 
> and a 2.6domU
> ?

Also, please could you try exporting the device to the dom0 as a scsi
device e.g. sda1 rather than ide device hde1 or hda1. [Yes, I know this
shouldn't make any difference, but I have a suspicion it will.]

Thanks,
Ian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance., Ian Pratt

Next by Date:

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance., B.G. Bruce

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance., B.G. Bruce

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance., peter bier

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: poor domU VBD performance.