|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size. 
| 
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Already the field offset comments are broken in a few places in unstable, so
> perhaps this is a better way to go.
it's an idea.  A few years ago I wrote drivers for SCI and had a mixed 
linux/alpha freebsd/pentium cluster. It's a little tricky to get everyone 
happily addressing each other's memories across that boundary, but I did 
it by making all struct fields unsigned long long and letting the 
compilers do the right thing. I didn't use a single __attribute__ 
directive, but at the same time, these fairly different machines with 
different OSes had shared memory. I still don't see why xen can not do the 
same.
ron
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Hollis Blanchard
RE: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ian PrattRe: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Kurt Garloff
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ronald G. Minnich
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ronald G. Minnich
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Jimi Xenidis
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Jimi Xenidis
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ronald G. Minnich
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size.,
Ronald G. Minnich <=
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Ronald G. Minnich
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., David Hopwood
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: 32 bits as smallest atomic size., David Hopwood
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |