| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxen-3.0 (libxc rewrite)
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 09:18 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Do you have a suggestion for an alternative? I know there are a number
of binding-generators but I thought Pyrex was the most widely used.
Pyrex is probably the most generally used -- the stuff pygtk uses is
nice, but not very general.
In most cases, though, bindings done by hand end up being higher quality
than something that's just being generated.
I was afraid that that would be your answer.
I would really like to automatically generate the bindings. There is
more C code in the current libxc/libxu python bindings than all of vm-tools.
gcc4 is still a bit off and I imagine that Pyrex will be updated as
needed. If it ever proves to be painful to deal with, I'll break down
and add bindings by hand. Does that seem like a reasonable plan moving
forward?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Jeremy
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6882&alloc_id=15148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home