WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.11 does not build SMP

To: Kurt Garloff <kurt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Linux 2.6.11 does not build SMP
From: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:13:50 -0800
Cc: Xen development list <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:22:14 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=jT/qZin5sUKXbaXPJcVB1L08E3dHC8ICVnBx6eMDkQW4Y4FEA0pWtmnBvmJFQRBUD8nVYmRHTsatLhksElnNjVMXHXDezdq/7+XRJTDw0ITwSFNaoOVMjjmCm86+NQ5OptgMHjLEVELVhF8L3JUSjco/95QikG9m75YoAg6wHC8=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050314000946.GE11361@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <b1fa291705031315327ef49f05@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050314000946.GE11361@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yeah, I did the same. I just thought I'd report it. 

      -Kip




On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 01:09:46 +0100, Kurt Garloff <kurt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Kip,
> 
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 03:32:50PM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
> > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,0)
> > #define QUEUE_SIZE 2048
> > #define pte_offset_kernel pte_offset
> > #define pmd_val_ma(v) (v).pmd;
> > #define pud_t pgd_t
> > #define pud_offset(d, va) d
> > #else
> > #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > #define QUEUE_SIZE 1
> > #else
> > #define QUEUE_SIZE 128
> > #define pmd_val_ma(v) (v).pud.pgd.pgd;
> > #endif
> > #endif
> 
> I just moved the second #define pmd_val_ma(v) one line down to make it
> compile. I did not investigate whether it's correct. I guess not, but
> I also guess it does no harm.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Kurt Garloff                   <kurt@xxxxxxxxxx>             [Koeln, DE]
> Physics:Plasma modeling <garloff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [TU Eindhoven, NL]
> Linux: SUSE Labs (Director)    <garloff@xxxxxxx>            [Novell Inc]
> 
> 
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel