WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Interrupt levels

To: Nicholas Lee <nic-lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Interrupt levels
From: Kurt Garloff <kurt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:58:42 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 21:59:46 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050308065220.GA1419@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: SUSE/Novell
References: <20050308065220.GA1419@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Hi Nicholas,

On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 07:52:26PM +1300, Nicholas Lee wrote:
> However on the dom0 instance (which doesn't run any of the above
> services, just the bridge) is seems very high:
> 
> nic@stateless:~$ vmstat 3
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu----
>  r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in    cs us sy id wa
>  0  0     12  10640     40  31168    0    0    17    25   94    19  0  1 99  0
>  0  0     12  10576     40  31168    0    0     0    17 170616    16  0  0 
> 100  0
>  0  0     12  10616     40  31168    0    0     0     0 171948    10  0  0 
> 100  0
>  0  0     12  10680     40  31168    0    0     0     0 171134    10  0  0 
> 100  0
>  0  0     12  10680     40  31168    0    0     0     3 169175    11  0  0 
> 100  0
>  0  0     12  10680     40  31168    0    0     0    15 173097    20  0  0 
> 100  0
> 
> 
> Is this level of interrupts reasonable? 

No. An up-to-date x86 machine can do something like ~200000 interrupts
per sec at 100% CPU load.

Regards,
-- 
Kurt Garloff                   <kurt@xxxxxxxxxx>             [Koeln, DE]
Physics:Plasma modeling <garloff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [TU Eindhoven, NL]
Linux: SUSE Labs (Director)    <garloff@xxxxxxx>            [Novell Inc]

Attachment: pgpBIiRiZ01px.pgp
Description: PGP signature