WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] x86-64 Xen development

To: "Jerone Young" <jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] x86-64 Xen development
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:47:17 -0000
Cc: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ian.pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 19:48:36 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcUgJeE4MClX+YpXTqGq4fmcHVaTgwAA1qHA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] x86-64 Xen development
> Sounds awesome! I'll be looking into supporting 32-bit apps. I am also
> getting the current tool ready for x86-64 to be able to lauch 64-bit
> domains.

Great. 
 
> Supporting 32-bit apps (as well as 32bit domains) are going to require
> an ioctl conversion layer as some syscall conversion stuff. Not 100%
> sure yet on how things are going to be just yet. I'll figure something
> out and get back to the list.

Supporting 32bit domains on 64 bit Xen is going to be ugly (requiring
shadow page tables), so I wouldn't count it as a priority. 32 bit user
space is certainly very important.

Ian

> 
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 09:03 -0800, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> > Ian Pratt wrote:
> > >>  What is Intel's status on x86-64 work for Xen? Do require any
> > >> assistance on any remaining work to get Xen x86-64 
> enabled? We want
> > >> to have more public discussion on x86-64 Xen development.
> > > 
> > > Jun,
> > > 
> > > Please can you post the x86_64 dom0 domain builder so 
> that Jerone can
> > > get to work on the user space builder.
> > > 
> > > Are there any fixes we need to do to x86_64 xen? Have you 
> an ETA on
> > > the dom0 checkin?
> > 
> > Ian,
> > 
> > I'm shooting the next week, in a week or so. We've been 
> making steady
> > progress despite _numerous_ minor issus/problems. Jerone, 
> it would be
> > helpful if you take a look at 32-bit apps support (i.e. what does it
> > take for us to support those in xenolinux64) because we are not
> > proactively looking at the area at this point.
> > 
> > There are a couple of minor fixes required in the hypervisor. For
> > example, check_descriptor() in arch/x86/x86-64/mm.c needs 
> to shift bits
> > when comparing the value.  
> > /* The guest can only safely be executed in ring 3. */
> >     if ( ((b & _SEGMENT_DPL) >> 13) !=  3) {
> >                 goto bad;
> >     }
> > I'll send patches this week.
> > 
> > Jun
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> Jerone Young
> Open Virtualization
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx
> 512-838-1157 (T/L: 678-1157)
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>