WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: RE: [Xen-devel] Bad read performance

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RE: [Xen-devel] Bad read performance
From: Kurt Garloff <kurt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:15:24 +0100
Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 13:10:36 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E32BE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: SUSE/Novell
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E32BE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Hi,

On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:04:56PM -0000, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > I notice that domain 0 gives bad performance with disk I/O. Domain 0
> > was given about 55MB RAM. With the same configuration, Linux on raw
> > hardware gives far better performance. While a raw Linux OS gives a
> > disk read throughput of around 20MB/sec (without any caching effects),
> > dom0 (using the Xen.2.0.4 kernel with linux kernel 2.6.10) gives only
> > about 2-3MB/sec throughput.
> > 
> > Any pointers to the reasons for this difference will be 
> > greatly helpful. 
> 
> Your dom0 kernel probably does not have the proper driver for you disk
> controller compiled in...

You probably loaded ide-generic which only supports PIO.
Once loaded, you can't load the chipset specific driver (which
would support DMA) any more.

Regards,
-- 
Kurt Garloff                   <kurt@xxxxxxxxxx>             [Koeln, DE]
Physics:Plasma modeling <garloff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [TU Eindhoven, NL]
Linux: SUSE Labs (Director)    <garloff@xxxxxxx>            [Novell Inc]

Attachment: pgpcuUbw9Tj3u.pgp
Description: PGP signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: RE: [Xen-devel] Bad read performance, Kurt Garloff <=