WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen, OpenMosix + pretty gui = virtual iron killer

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen, OpenMosix + pretty gui = virtual iron killer
From: Orran Y Krieger <okrieg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:04:00 -0500
Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:06:07 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050221092720.6973F33C9C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The impression I got from a couple of questions to the speaker was that they supported DSM in the hypervisor, and that the Linux was not terribly aware.  OpenMosix + Xen could do much better I think.  Interesting synchronization questions to be worked out though.
           -- Orran

> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:04:35 -0000
> To: "Denis Bohm" <denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>    "Jerry Normandin" <jerryn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen, OpenMosix + pretty gui = virtual iron killer
> From: "Jerry Normandin" <jerryn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Your right Denis.  I checked thier website.  It's not a mozilla friendly
> website either, you can't get
> to all the links.  I believe we all can do a better job on the interface.
> From what I saw at Linux world the interface is broseer driven.  I was
> trying to get a chance to get to an xterm window so I can do ldd on the
> libraries and binaries but I didn't get a chance. they were too busy with
> the demo.  From what I saw it looked an aweful lot like Xen running on top
> of Open Mosix with
> a gui to glue it all together.  
>
>
> This motivated me enough to try to scrap some equipment together and put
> together a two node
> Open Mosix Cluster and load Xen up. Possibly start testing.  I don't have
> enough $$$ right now
> to get some Infiniband hardware, but I can complete some testing with the
> hardware I have.
>
>  
>
>
>
> Denis Bohm <denis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> > I searched around a bit on the web, but couldn't find anything about
> > their GUI.  Anyone have any pointers to info on it?
> >
> > Jerry Normandin wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>  I was at Linux World today and stopped by the Virtual Iron
> booth.  Could this
> >>be a copy of xen technology?   Virtual Iron appears to be a
> combination of xen
> >>and open mosix technology.  Has anyone tried running xen on an Open Mosix
> >>cluster?  With the new Infiniband hardware out I bet we could
> build an effecient
> >>cluster.  I can test with low end hardware for now, I don't have
> the $$$ to buy
> >>two dell poweredge 6600 series servers and some Infiniband
> equipment.  But I can
> >>build a 2 node AMD cluster with a gigibit interconnect for test.  
> >>
> >>
> >>  I kind of confronted the sales engineer at LinuxWorld and asked,"hey does
> >>this products' roots from Xen and OpenMosix?" The attendant got
> pretty angry and
> >>said "If Xen used Open Mosix to come up with a competing soultion they would
> >>sue!"  What a jerk! This  company has no clue what open source is about!
> >>I say, as a community, lets do it!  If we can get true virtualization on the
> >>hardware so we can be OS agnostic that would be even better.