On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Mark Williamson wrote:
I'm running Xen on Fedora core 3...
uname -a
Linux groucho 2.6.10-1.1148_FC4xen0 #1 SMP Sat Feb 19 15:15:24 EST 2005
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
# xm list
Name Id Mem(MB) CPU State Time(s) Console
Domain-0 0 121 0 r---- 140.9
Looks good.
What I'm trying to do is get SuSE 9.2 to come up in it's own domain..
/dev/hda2 = root for FC-3
/dev/hdb2 = root for SuSE 9.2
My config file in /etc/xen (suse)
# cat suse
kernel ="/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.10-1.1148_FC4xenU"
memory = 64
name = "suse"
nics = 1
disk = ['phy:hdb2,hdb2,w']
root = "/dev/hdb2 ro"
Also looks good, although I doubt the FC4 kernel includes support for ReiserFS
Actually, it does - but as a module, not built-in. So he needs to build an
initrd - see my previous message.
I don't think this is a filesystem support problem - it looks like it's not
getting that far. However, SuSE 9.2 uses udev
So does Fedora Core 3, so its initrds should work.
so it seems likely you'll
need to boot the SuSE domain with an initrd.
Yup
The stock one in your
SuSE /boot may do the trick
Not with this kernel it won't, because this is a Fedora xenU kernel.
(If that doesn't work, I think there's also a
Xen-specific one in the SuSE Xen rpms).
The only trouble with that is, the SuSE Xen rpms probably use a different
version of the Xen patch, which might be incompatible, as you point out.
Does anyone know whether FC4 is currently on the -stable, -testing or
-unstable version of Xen?
-unstable
--
Robin
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
| 
Home