WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: Building domains as a lesser user (was Re: [Xen-devel] bootloaders f

To: "Jeremy Katz" <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Building domains as a lesser user (was Re: [Xen-devel] bootloaders for domain != 0)
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:38:17 -0000
Cc: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 09:39:32 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcUKZv4LFIW0Qpa6RcC9fdtj8ZfKBgANGT7Q
Thread-topic: Building domains as a lesser user (was Re: [Xen-devel] bootloaders for domain != 0)
> On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 02:30 +0000, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > One fairly simple option is to use Linux as a domU boot loader. Boot
> > with an intrd, mount the specified filesystem, read off 
> grub.conf, display a menu over
> > the xencons, kexec the appropriate kernel.
> 
> Linux really seems like a very heavy hammer for something like this.
> Even just thinking from a resource perspective, why boot up a whole
> kernel to do nothing more than read an fs and mount another kernel.

I don't buy the resource argument: it takes only a couple of seconds to
boot a xenU kernel to user space, and you're about to be booting another
kernel anyhow.

> Especially as you start thinking about things like modular fs's, etc,
> it's going to be much less clean of a solution and be a significant
> slowdown on your guest boot time.

A few seconds slow down -- nothing compared to what a BIOS normally
adds.

I don't see why the filesystems would particularly need to be modular,
though you might do so for convenience. 

> And then, it's yet another kernel to keep updated, etc.

I don't see any reason to keep it up to date. Its running in a protected
environemnt and doesn't have any extra access that the kernel about to
be booted is going to get.
I think this approach will work well.

We already booy all of our *physical* machines using a CDROM containing
a Linux bootloader -- see xenoboot:
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xeno/xenoboot/

Ian


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel