On Wednesday 19 January 2005 14:35, Henning Glawe wrote:
> Moin,
> I just did a quick comparison regarding speed of xen vs. vmware-workstation
> using a FAI installation test (FAI is a debian autoinstaller).
>
> Test setup:
> host "burns", athlon xp 2100+, 512MB, via chipset
> - provides an nfsroot (on hda)
> - second disk is partitioned into hdb1, hdb5, hdb6
> - hdb5 and hdb6 are exported to vmware or xenU
> - installation pumps 4.1G of software from a local debian mirror to hdb6
> (seen as hda6 in xenU/vmware ws) using apt and configures the software
> - assigned 192 M of Memory in both cases to the virtual machines
> - burns is connected to the local debian mirror using a 1000 mbit NIC and a
> switch
I really don't know how this installation works, but just in case: Is it
possible "burns" only pulls from the mirror the first time, and on subsequent
installations it is cached? I am wondering if the first test (Xen) it had to
pull data across the network, and on the second test (Vmware) already had the
data cached on burns.
So far I haven't seem much degrade at all in the tests I have run (dbench3,
SDET, kernel compiles). Actually I was quite surprised how well the VBD's IO
performance was so far. The only "significant" degrade I have seen was SDET,
around 12.5% lower than bare metal linux. I have not looked into network
performance yet, but I think that'll be next on my list...
-Andrew Theurer
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Home