 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] calling vif-script
| To: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] calling vif-script |
| From: | Kero-Chan <kerochan2@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:11:42 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:30:21 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=HFrhbOGGUn+1Ma7KURV5CxOeb8jprAqCR16RB3oTRpmW8nt16gEf7WYy7REY0kGhUBRyQFZR7+xlkca3r40fmdAZvJiPEov4Ig050d9LaFgskcY0foP1KwCcDPytujymy0Ne6TPKed2T2Ixzg/nAeVDEKxtEMbMsz9AqLxY6pJ8= |
| Envelope-to: | xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <3b793f1a050118171242d5ce53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-archive: | <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help> |
| List-id: | List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> |
| List-subscribe: | <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <200501181914.17382.gm281@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1Cr1uN-0003Sr-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <3b793f1a050118171242d5ce53@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Kero-Chan <kerochan2@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:12:18 +0100, Kero-Chan <kerochan2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > vif-route does not currently work. It's OK for a single domU, but if I > start more domains, all the vifs get the same IP! Each vif would need > a separate IP for routing to work. > vif-route doesn't set up the route either. > So what would be a good scheme? 169.254.X.Y for vifX.Y? > A domain may get different vifs at different times, and a different IP > for the vif would interfere with using NFS root from dom0 (nfs_server > would be always different). > What about a vif_ip or similar option in the domain configuration file? OK sorry. I realised my previous post is plain wrong. -- /Varga Péter/ ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] x86_64 support, Kurt Garloff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [Xen-devel] high I/O cost for drbd and xen?, Ian Pratt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] calling vif-script, Kero-Chan |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] calling vif-script, Ian Pratt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
