| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Windows...
>Mark A. Williamson wrote:
>> Since there's VT code being integrated into Xen currently it seems
>>reasonable to assume that when VT hardware comes out, Windows will Just
>>Work (TM) but I don't know the concrete plans. I may be wrong...
>
>Well, I think that even if Windows itself can run unmodified, there'd
>still need to be a virtual BIOS, virtual VGA device, virtual IDE
>controller, virtual NIC device, etc. They'd need to be emulations of
>real devices, at least they'd have to be availabe until drivers can be
>loaded (and written, of course) for Windows that can take over and
>bypass the emulated devices. So the support for Intel VT/AMD Pacifica is
>just the first step of many, really.
Some support for fully virtual devices is already checked into the
-unstable tree (see tools/ioemu). This is useful for start-of-day,
but in practice for performance one would replace these drivers with
Xen-aware paravirtualized ones after install.
cheers,
S.
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home