WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] network advice needed

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] network advice needed
From: Andrew Theurer <habanero@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:40:11 -0600
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:09:13 +0000
Envelope-to: xen+James.Bulpin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5
Newbie Xen network advice needed.  I'd like to do the following:  Have domain0 
masqerade all other domains (on that system) through the physical ethernet 
adapter in domain0.  I'd like all of the other domains to have an IP 
addresses in 192.168.0.0/24.  Domain0 will also dhcp serve IP's to the other 
domains.  I want to do this, so I can dynamically create as many domains as I 
need without worrying about IP address assignment headaches.

So, this is what I think I need:

doamin0: has my physical network adapter with my static IP address, and an 
ethernet bridge which has IP address of 192.168.0.1.  

domain[1-N]: has vifN.0, with IP address in subnet 192.168.0.0/24

Some iptables setup to MASQ from dev br0 and out eth0.

The main thing I see that needs chaning is simply not move domain0's eth0 IP 
address to the bridge, but assign it 192.168.0.1.  Is that correct?

Thanks,

Andrew Theurer



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>