|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] xen-stable vs. xen-testing
So given the recent announcement of the linux local-privilege-escalation
I want to upgrade my Xen box/VM to the latest kernel. I see that the
xen-2.0 tree still has 2.6.9 and xen-testing has 2.6.10 patches. So I
have a few questions:
a) how stable is "testing" really?
b) can I just build new kernels from the -testing tree or should I build
the Xen VMM as well?
c) do any of the Xen folks track BUGTRAQ or anything to keep up on
potential kernel-level bugs that should be addressed relatively quickly?
Granted, I don't think I've seen a legitimate linux kernel exploit in
like four or five years now, but should another one pop up and I do
track security lists would it be worth my effort to relay the info to
the xen-list?
d) I realize that Xen is really still R&D for the most part, but how do
the Xen team feel about security issues like this?
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] xen-stable vs. xen-testing,
Derek Glidden <=
|
|
|
|
|