Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability

> So far, we are extremely happy with the stability of 2.0.  Congrats.

That's good to hear.

Do you still use NFS root? Do you use 2.4 or 2.6 kernels?

> Well, it took us a long time to actually deploy a working 2.0 server.  The
> default method of using a bridge broke the all nfs-root setup we had(our cpu
> nodes are diskless; makes them easier to maintain).

I want to get example scripts for a routed (as opposed to bridged
setup) checked into the tree...

Thansk,
Ian


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability, Adam Heath Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability, Ian Pratt <= Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability, Adam Heath

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] undefined symbol: xc_vmx_build, Ian Pratt

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability, Adam Heath

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability, Adam Heath

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] xen 2.0(.1) stability, Adam Heath

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]