Re: [Xen-devel] Porting Xen

It has already been posted. It will be pushed into FreeBSD cvs as well
as the xen bitkeeper archive.



                        -Kip


On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, David Rhodus wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:50:08 -0800 (PST), Kip Macy <kmacy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Is OpenBSD closer to FreeBSD than NetBSD?
> >
> > It is a fork of NetBSD, but the FreeBSD port was completed more
> > recently.
> >
>
> Is the code from the port going to be made public available ?
> --
>                                             -David
>                                             Steven David Rhodus
>                                             <drhodus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Porting Xen, David Rhodus

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] failed startup caused by unpriveledged domain device nodes not present in priviledged domain, Scott Mohekey

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Porting Xen, David Rhodus

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Porting Xen, David Hopwood

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]