Re: [Xen-devel] Installing Fedora Core 2 inside an unprivileged

> On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 19:32, John L Griffin wrote:
> > Well, drat.  Ian's and Luciano's comments are correct: on the FC2 and FC3 
> > ISO images, the anaconda installer appears to require a successful module 
> > load before proceeding with an installation.  This is true even when 
> > mountable block device nodes exist on the system.
> 
> Is it possible to make Xen-U kernels fake the loading of modules?  Every
> time someone says "insmod foobar", the kernel would say "ok, foobar is
> now on the lsmod list" but then it doesn't actually run any code in the
> module.

There's nothing that can be done in the kernel to help this.
 
> Would this fake-out anaconda sufficiently?  Or does anaconda run
> 'insmod' or 'modprobe' (in which case replacing those programs with
> symlinks to '/bin/true' would fix the problem)?

Good idea - I think it's well worth giving this a try by hacking
the initrd.

Ian


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Installing Fedora Core 2 inside an unprivileged domain, John L Griffin

Next by Date:

[Xen-devel] xm save and restore problem, Xuehai Zhang

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Installing Fedora Core 2 inside an unprivileged domain, John L Griffin

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Installing Fedora Core 2 inside an unprivileged domain, Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]