On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 13:59, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 19:20, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > > What were you using before? I seem to recall it was 2.0-testing.bk?
> > Yes, 2.0-testing.bk fails, but xeno-unstable.bk passes.
> >
> > > There's currently very few changes between unstable and 2.0-testing
> > Great! Maybe it'll be easier to see what fixed it in xeno-unstable.
>
> The latest 2.0-testing and unstable trees only differ in that a new
> 'blktap' driver was added to the unstable tree, which is not even
> built by default. It really looks to be impossible that you could be
> seeing different behaviour between the two repositories. :-/
I see, I was running a diff of the trees a while ago and I see what you
mean. However, it has been very easy to reproduce this under testing,
but on unstable, it never failed for me even once. So, I installed gcc
3.2 and tried compiling testing with that, and it works now, no crash!
So it looks like it is a compiler issue after all.
Thanks,
Paul Larson
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Home