WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 kernel crashes with kernel panic during boot

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 kernel crashes with kernel panic during boot
From: Jan Kundrat <jan.kundrat@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:38:31 +0100 (CET)
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:40:31 +0000
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1CULqr-0008MZ-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1CULqr-0008MZ-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What are the issues? I know some binary drivers don't like it (e.g.,
> nvidia) but they don't work on Xen anyway.
> 
>  -- Keir

if I'm not mistaken, CONFIG_4KSTACKS disables reiser4 support (at least on 
vanilla 2.6.8.1, not sure about Xen). Not a problem for me, though.

> 
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 02:36:58AM +0000, Ian Pratt wrote:
> > 
> > > Rumour has it that FC3 kernels use it by default.
> > 
> > They do, before FC3 even.
> > 
> > And it caused problems for some people (in areas that RH doesn't
> > support).
> > 
> > The worst cases might be all fixed by now --- but I'm not certain of
> > that.
> > 
> > > If not, then I guess we should revert. At least this way it gets
> > > tested in the unstable tree ;-)
> > 
> > Doing something because FC<n> does it isn't a good enough reason IMO.
> > There might be good reasons for it, but that isn't one.
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
> FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
> robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
> for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
> 
> 

-- 
Jan Kundrat
jan.kundrat@xxxxxx



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>