On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 12:09 -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Peri Hankey wrote:
> >
> > > It occurred to me that the equivalent in the Xen world would be to use
> > > one Linux xenU domain purely as a page-table manager for a collection of
> > > separate xenU domains that are expected or known have similar process
> > > populations.
> >
> > UML copy on write is only for filesystems, isn't it ?
>
> And, since UML can use mmap access, if there are shared filesystems, it can
> reduce memory pressure. Maybe that is something that can be worked on for
> xen.
>
If you're going to design a system like this I believe it's important to
also consider a method of re-sharing filesystems. With UML after a
length of time all the software will not be shared anymore and you see
no memory gains. There really needs to be a way for things to be re-
linked. VServer does this on a filesystem level by doing a name,
permissions, and SHA1 hash comparision. I think for a CoW file-backed
disk image you'd have to do block level though. This way if httpd
binary get updated (ie. via yum/apt/up2date) on all domains that have a
shared backing store there should be a method to re-share that httpd
binary.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Home