xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] copy on write memory
I tried applying it in a spirit of pure optimism (naivety). You never know.
To return for one moment to the thing I was chasing. Let's assume that
in its standard configuration the Linux (or indeed some other kernel)
makes a very good job of sharing memory across processes by means of the
copy-on-write fork semantics and by exploiting the overall view that it
has of how pages/blocks are read from the filesystem and modified by
processes. Let's hope that it (or they) get even better. We would like
separate xenU domains to benefit from the excellence that exists and the
improvements that may be.
My idea is to use a memory-privileged xenU domain as a page-table
manager for a group of client domains. It would have to know about the
memory/page/block usage of every process in each of its clients as if
they were all running within it. But it would never operate as the
actual kernel for any of these processes. For those purposes each
process would operate under the supervision of a memory-client domain
that has its own kernel address space.
I haven't at present got the intimate knowledge of memory management
traffic between xen, xen0 and xenU domains that I would need to see
whether or not this idea has any legs. But I am very interested to know
what anyone thinks. No doubt the best answer is to go and study the code.
Anyway, thanks for your help, and for your quick repsonse. Much quicker
than mine.
Regards
Peri
urmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
It's true, you did mention it before, but I was looking for something
else at the time. What I have in mind doesn't require so much
configuration. On the other hand it doesn't exist, and this does.
Ah. I couldn't remember if I'd sent it or not (or if I'd even tried to send
it from an address that was on the list, a few go to the same mailbox at
the moment)
But the patch is against quite an old source, and it doesn't compile
straight out of the box. Do you know if there are updated patches
against 2.6.9?
I can check.
I get this error (which I haven't yet examined in detail):
CC [M] fs/xip2fs/file.o
fs/xip2fs/file.c: In function `xip2_do_file_read':
fs/xip2fs/file.c:69: error: structure has no member named `buf'
fs/xip2fs/file.c: In function `__xip2_file_aio_read':
fs/xip2fs/file.c:119: error: structure has no member named `buf'
fs/xip2fs/file.c: In function `xip2_file_sendfile':
fs/xip2fs/file.c:302: error: structure has no member named `buf'
This was against xen-2.0.1 as of today 18 Nov 2004
I highly doubt that it will be directly applicable to xen - the entire backend
mechanism is linked into the z/VM shared memory system between guests. I was
more pointing it out as a probable jumping off point (most of the work is done,
it just needs to use the xen memory sharing instead) and as a workable
concept for a less-cpu-intensive copy-on-write mechanism.
I'll take a look for a newer patch and see if I can scrape up some time to
apply the backend to xen, but I don't know when I'll get a chance -- don't let
me hold anyone else up who was considering working on it.
-m
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] copy on write memory, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] copy on write memory,
Peri Hankey <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] copy on write memory, Jacob Gorm Hansen
- Re: [Xen-devel] copy on write memory, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] copy on write memory, Jacob Gorm Hansen
- Re: [Xen-devel] copy on write memory, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] copy on write memory, Jacob Gorm Hansen
- [Xen-devel] of cows and clones: creating domains as clones of saved state, Peri Hankey
- Re: [Xen-devel] of cows and clones: creating domains as clones of saved state, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] of cows and clones: creating domains as clones of saved state, Peri Hankey
- Re: [Xen-devel] of cows and clones: creating domains as clones of saved state, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] of cows and clones: creating domains as clones of saved state, Keir Fraser
|
|
|