WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NPTL/TLS "emulation" idea (fwd)

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NPTL/TLS "emulation" idea (fwd)
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:21:46 -0400
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, roland@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 20:42:03 +0100
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <E1CKKFQ-0003Zu-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20041020170925.GW31909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <E1CKKFQ-0003Zu-00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:27:39PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 12:55:22PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > >    4. Provide an alternative libc that does the +ve accesses (which are
> > >       libc private, afaik) in another segment.  This does not break the
> > >       ABI for userland programs and -ve accesses aren't that bad when
> > >       there are no +ve accesses in the same segment.
> > 
> > No, the ABI uses -ve accesses and %gs:0 (4 bytes there), +ve accesses
> > above +4 are glibc private.
> 
> Could we duplicate %gs:0 at %gs:-4 and update the ABI? Or is the ABI
> now set in stone?

The ABI is there for several years, used e.g. in Solaris as well
and is used already in several libraries, not just glibc.
The ABI is not going to change for the sake of emulators.

        Jakub


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel