WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Stable and unstable trees

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Stable and unstable trees
From: Paul Dorman <pauld@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:33:28 +1200
Delivery-date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:38:18 +0100
Envelope-to: steven.hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=xen-devel>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-id: List for Xen developers <xen-devel.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.7
On Friday 01 October 2004 12:59 pm, Mark A. Williamson wrote:
<snip>
> > I've been experiencing some unstability in the 2.0bk code, particularly
> > when I use ReiserFS formatted LVM partitions with the 2.6 kernel. I have
> > yet to get the serial console working (ttyS0) yet, so I have nothing for
> > you as of yet, but I am working on that as time permits.
>
> That's not something I'd expect to see problems with, unless you're seeing
> the RAM-related problems with LVM mentioned recently on this list.
</snip>

I would say that it probably is RAM/LVM related. What's the concensus on how 
to manage this? Is it just a problem for Dom-0? If so, how much RAM should be 
allocated? At the moment I have a very hefty allocation of 376MB to avoid 
problems while I get everything else running, but I'd like to get that closer 
to 128MB if possible.

Are there any changes afoot to manage the memory related issues more 
gracefully? Or if they are caused by bugs in the Linux-2.6 LVM code, are they 
being attended to by the kernel developers?

Cheers,
Paul

P.S. Just booted unstable. I think I'll stick with this for a while :o)
PD


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>