|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] question on frontend ethernet
 
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Ian Pratt wrote:
> I'm not sure it's worth going to the extent of having /proc entries that
> provide this when it's pretty easy just to knock up a little application
> that uses priv_cmd to fetch it, e.g. to write core dumps.  (I think
> someone may have already done this?)
actually, I'll get picky and say this is not how Plan 9 really works. In
Linux and other Unix-like systems, stuff like sysfs and proc etc. are
add-ons and the drivers have to get engaged in making entries in /proc.  
You can have a driver that has no proc or sysfs entries.
In Plan 9, the fact that devices (including proc) look "like a file" is
integral to the overall operation of the system.
It's very attractive once you get used to it, to say the least. I keep 
getting mad at Linux because it feels so primitive; reminds me of the good 
old days when I got mad at OSes that weren't as good as Unix ...
oh well, enough ranting :-)
ron
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |