Re: [Xen-devel] xm create option parsing..

[Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> We potentially have
> 
> xm <xm options> subcommand <subcommand options/args>
> 
> It doesn't really make sense to allow xm options after the subcommand.

What <xm options> do we currently have? Having a -U to set the
host:port might be nice, but what others do we currently have?

> Each subcommand is responsible for parsing its own options, so
> we could get 'xm create' etc. to allow options after the args.
> I'll make the change.

Users will thank you ;-)

Thanks,
Ian