|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working
On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, James Harper wrote:
> If devfs is indeed disappearing in 2.6 then there's probably not a lot
> of point adding support for it. Debian can use it, but I don't think
> it's enabled by default. I like the way devfs works but obviously most
> people don't.
yes, on point in fooling with devfs. It's dead.
ron
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] No module named xen.xm error, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] No module named xen.xm error, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working, Niraj Tolia
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working, James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working, xen
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working,
ron minnich <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: almost working, Jody Belka
|
|
|
|
|