|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] problems with latest unstable
> I have a dual-processor Opteron 242 with 8GB of RAM running 32-bit
> Fedora Core 1 (yes that means that 4GB is unused). I installed the
> latest unstable on it last night.
>
> I'm not sure what was happening because as currently configured it
> doesn't print anything past:
> (XEN) Device eth0 opened and ready for use.
> (XEN) Xen trace buffers: initialised
> (XEN) *** LOADING DOMAIN 0 ***
> (XEN) Xen-ELF header found: 'GUEST_OS=linux,GUEST_VER=2.4,XEN_VER=1.3'
> (XEN) PHYSICAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
> (XEN) Kernel image: 02800000->02992810
> (XEN) Initrd image: 00000000->00000000
> (XEN) Dom0 alloc.: 02c00000->12c00000
> (XEN) VIRTUAL MEMORY ARRANGEMENT:
> (XEN) Loaded kernel: c0000000->c01c6f08
> (XEN) Init. ramdisk: c01c7000->c01c7000
> (XEN) Phys-Mach map: c01c7000->c0207000
> (XEN) Page tables: c0207000->c0209000
> (XEN) Start info: c0209000->c020a000
> (XEN) Boot stack: c020a000->c020b000
> (XEN) TOTAL: c0000000->c0400000
> (XEN) ENTRY ADDRESS: c0000000
> (XEN) *** Serial input -> DOM0 (type 'CTRL-a' three times to switch
> input to Xen).
> (XEN) Give DOM0 read access to all PCI devices
> (XEN) tg3: eth0: Link is up at 1000 Mbps, full duplex.
> (XEN) tg3: eth0: Flow control is off for TX and off for RX.
>
>
> 'ping' indicated that it would come up for about 20 seconds and then
> reboot. I enabled "debug ?= y" in Rules.mk and now it more or less
> works :-O.
Scary.
What compiler are you using?
The lack of DOM0 output with the non debug build suggests that
Linux is dieing before its got the console subsystem up (which
happens annoyingly late in the init sequence.
To get around this, I often add a
'HYPERVISOR_console_write(printk_buf, sizeof(printk_buf)' to
printk in kernel/printk.c
> One interesting thing that is probably worth noting is that
> every time I type 'ls', I get the following on the console:
> (XEN) (file=traps.c, line=460) GPF (0004): fc5e3fa8 -> fc5f1fc5
Hmm. This may suggest that Fedora has yet another sick and
twisted way of abusing segment registers for referencing thread
local storage for posix threads, and we're hitting an unexpected
(and probably slow) code path...
It might help to see an strace and an output of ldconfig -v, but
I suspect we'd need to recreate the setup to get anywhere.
Ian
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Need help.., Neugebauer, Rolf
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Need help.., I RATTAN
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Need help.., Mark Williamson
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Need help.., I RATTAN
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Need help.., Rolf Neugebauer
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Need help.., I RATTAN
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Need help.., I RATTAN
- [Xen-devel] problems with latest unstable, Kip Macy
- Re: [Xen-devel] problems with latest unstable,
Ian Pratt <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] problems with latest unstable, Kip Macy
- Re: [Xen-devel] problems with latest unstable, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] problems with latest unstable, Nuno Silva
- Re: [Xen-devel] problems with latest unstable, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|