|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paging oopses
While we're on the topic of compiler idiosyncracies, I'm wondering if it
really makes sense to compile the tools with -O3. They're not
performance critical, so it seems like the risks might outweigh the
gains.
-Kip
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Keir Fraser wrote:
> > Aargh! Please disregard. While processing ksymoops just now I realized
> > that the two guest machines that had these oopses were in fact the
> > *only* two that I hadn't yet upgraded to the 12 Feb/GCC 3.3.2 xenolinux.
> > These were running the new Xen, old xenolinux. All others have been
> > fine, with a week of runtime so far.
>
> Phew. :-)
>
> Of course, we're interested in any crashes that occur when using GCC
> 2.95.3 and 3.3.x. We'll also accept crash dumps from 3.2.2 -- I've
> heard that this compiler has trouble with Linux in some cases, but
> since it's the compiler that we use the most (it ships with RH9), we
> have some degree of trust in it!
>
> I've taken a lot of time in the last week to shake bugs out of
> Xen/Xenolinux 1.2. Hopefully this will reduce the number of bug
> reports, despite the recent upgrade to linux-2.4.25.
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
>
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] 0-order allocation failed, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] 0-order allocation failed, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Re: paging request failures under load (was: Re: Null pointer deference), stevegt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: paging request failures under load (was: Re: Null pointer deference), Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] Paging oopses, stevegt
- [Xen-devel] Re: Paging oopses, stevegt
- [Xen-devel] Re: Paging oopses, stevegt
- [Xen-devel] Re: Paging oopses, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Paging oopses,
Kip Macy <=
- [Xen-devel] Mandrake-9.1 and Xen.., I RATTAN
- Re: [Xen-devel] Mandrake-9.1 and Xen.., Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Mandrake-9.1 and Xen.., I RATTAN
- Re: [Xen-devel] Mandrake-9.1 and Xen.., Kip Macy
- Re: [Xen-devel] Mandrake-9.1 and Xen.., Ian Pratt
Re: [Xen-devel] Null pointer deference, Ian Pratt
|
|
|
|
|