|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] PHY vs. VD benchmark
I did some quick benchmarks in case somebody is interested. Few words about
the setup:
DOM1 64Mb RAM, vd:1 (4Gb on real /dev/sdb)
DOM2 64Mb RAM, sda1 (4Gb mapped from real /dev/sdc5)
sdb is configured with only two VD's (4Gb root + 128Mb swap) so that in both
cases partitions lay at the beginning of the physical disk. I suspect at
least, because I don't know how VD code allocates space. sdc also has only
two phy partitions with the same setup.
Both have identical root fs-s.
Single run is done while other domains sit idle.
Concurrent run is both domain running bonnie++, well, concurrently :)
It seems that phy is significantly faster than vd, and that concurrent i/o
load on separate disks doesn't hurt performace.
Detailed log attached.
bonnie-phy-concurrent.log
Description: Text Data
bonnie-vd-single.log
Description: Text Data
bonnie-phy-single.log
Description: Text Data
bonnie-vd-concurrent.log
Description: Text Data
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] PHY vs. VD benchmark,
Tvrtko A. Uršulin <=
|
|
|
|
|