[Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS?

Two quickies for the Xen developers:

1. Are you putting code changes into both the 1.1rc and
-unstable code base?  If not, which one is getting all
the patches that Bin and others have been applying?

2. Awhile ago, I thought that Kurt added ReiserFS support
by default to the Xen kernel (2.4.22 tree's .config).  This
doesn't seem to be there now, but I'd like to urge you to consider
adding it by default.  It doesn't add much size to the kernel
image, and seems like a no-brainer to enable.

I want to go and hit someone at RedHat over the head with
a cluebat for not enabling ReiserFS, and take the 
same cluebat to someone at SuSE for not enabling ext3.

Thanks!  Greg


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] Installation, Gregory Newby
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] Installation, Chris Mason
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] Installation, Bin Ren
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] unstable or 1.1rc? ReiserFS?, Chris Mason
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]