WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-cim

RE: [Xen-cim] [PATCH]move to changeset 14542

To: "Ewan Mellor" <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-cim] [PATCH]move to changeset 14542
From: "Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 08:24:25 -0400
Cc: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-ciM <xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 05:23:27 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20070405081918.GA23112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: xen-cim mailing list <xen-cim.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-cim@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-cim>, <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-cim>, <mailto:xen-cim-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-cim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acd3Wx5Hb29GTslgSk28Nza/UySLIgAISOIA
Thread-topic: [Xen-cim] [PATCH]move to changeset 14542
Ewan, 

>> I have left two things open.
>> - I was not sure how to integrate with the vbd and vdi code that has 
>> come in. These sections of code were commented out with 
>VBD<->VDI issue.
>I don't know what this means.  Could you explain?
The earlier code just used a field called image to refer to the disk
image. That field has been moved to the vdi_record_opt structure, I
think. I haven't yet written the code to read this structure. 

>> - The upstream has not yet accepted the model info for vifs 
>patch that 
>> Jim sent out.
>
>Jim said that he would go and try a different approach 
>(putting the model info in a VIF.other_config dictionary), but 
>he hasn't yet come back to me with a new patch.
Cool.

>> This is just the first cut. I was not able to rigorously 
>test it since 
>> my hvm box is still under the 'old' xen. I am hoping that by sending 
>> it out, we will have more people working on it. With this, I can do 
>> some basic enumeration etc.
>> The big change between 14542 and the tip seems to be some change in 
>> the session handling code.
>
>Calls on the session class now take two session references -- 
>the first is the session that you're authenticating with, as 
>with any call, and the second is the session that you actually 
>want to talk about.  This will allow us (later) to have the 
>ability for superusers to inspect other people's sessions, for example.
>
>As far as you're concerned, just passing in the same session 
>handle twice should be all you need to do.
Thanks

Raj

_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>