RE: [Xen-cim] ProcessorPool commit & CIM_ConcreteComponent

["Subrahmanian, Raj" <raj.subrahmanian@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jim,
I was browsing the ProcessorPool mofs (to see what I could steal for the
MemoryPool code, of course :) )and I noticed that there was no
CIM_ConcreteComponent association.
Don't we need this? I have included the relevant section from Resource
Allocation Profile. 
Also, If we do, is the right nomenclature?
Xen_ConcreteMemory, Xen_ConcreteMemoryComponent,
Xen_MemoryConcreteComponent?
Raj

7.1.2 Host Resources - (Optional)

Aggregation of Host Resources is optional. When aggregation of Host
Resources is supported there shall be at least one instance of
LogicalDevice associated with the ResourcePool instance through the
ConcreteComponent association. When a Resource Pool is used for the
allocation of fully synthetic virtual resources, aggregation of Host
Resources shall not be supported. When a pool is used for dedicated or
shared resources, aggregation of Host Resources should be supported.
When aggregation of Host Resources is supported, the ResourcePool
Capacity property shall be supported. An instance of LogicalDevice
representing a Host Resource shall be associated with zero or one
instances of ResourcePool through the ConcreteComponent association.

_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim