WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-changelog

[Xen-changelog] [xen-3.1-testing] x86: Reduce assertion aggressiveness i

To: xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-changelog] [xen-3.1-testing] x86: Reduce assertion aggressiveness in send_IPI_mask().
From: "Xen patchbot-3.1-testing" <patchbot-3.1-testing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:23 -0700
Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:30:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-changelog-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: BK change log <xen-changelog.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-changelog@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-changelog>, <mailto:xen-changelog-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-changelog>, <mailto:xen-changelog-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-changelog-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# HG changeset patch
# User Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
# Date 1208938710 -3600
# Node ID 25967d50bc9373d03965f8dfea8358dbd528b475
# Parent  776e39a33bc18422faca01df67b3a74852337710
x86: Reduce assertion aggressiveness in send_IPI_mask().
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
xen-unstable changeset:   17503:a5319f23db7c0985ac7ac84a998fedf435565062
xen-unstable date:        Wed Apr 23 09:15:34 2008 +0100
---
 xen/arch/x86/smp.c |   23 +++--------------------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff -r 776e39a33bc1 -r 25967d50bc93 xen/arch/x86/smp.c
--- a/xen/arch/x86/smp.c        Wed Apr 23 09:03:29 2008 +0100
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/smp.c        Wed Apr 23 09:18:30 2008 +0100
@@ -76,23 +76,14 @@ static inline int __prepare_ICR2 (unsign
     return SET_APIC_DEST_FIELD(mask);
 }
 
-static inline void check_IPI_mask(cpumask_t cpumask)
-{
-    /*
-     * Sanity, and necessary. An IPI with no target generates a send accept
-     * error with Pentium and P6 APICs.
-     */
-    ASSERT(cpus_subset(cpumask, cpu_online_map));
-    ASSERT(!cpus_empty(cpumask));
-}
-
 void send_IPI_mask_flat(cpumask_t cpumask, int vector)
 {
     unsigned long mask = cpus_addr(cpumask)[0];
     unsigned long cfg;
     unsigned long flags;
 
-    check_IPI_mask(cpumask);
+    /* An IPI with no target generates a send accept error from P5/P6 APICs. */
+    WARN_ON(mask == 0);
 
     local_irq_save(flags);
 
@@ -125,17 +116,9 @@ void send_IPI_mask_phys(cpumask_t mask, 
     unsigned long cfg, flags;
     unsigned int query_cpu;
 
-    check_IPI_mask(mask);
-
-    /*
-     * Hack. The clustered APIC addressing mode doesn't allow us to send 
-     * to an arbitrary mask, so I do a unicasts to each CPU instead. This 
-     * should be modified to do 1 message per cluster ID - mbligh
-     */ 
-
     local_irq_save(flags);
 
-    for_each_cpu_mask( query_cpu, mask )
+    for_each_cpu_mask ( query_cpu, mask )
     {
         /*
          * Wait for idle.

_______________________________________________
Xen-changelog mailing list
Xen-changelog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-changelog

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-changelog] [xen-3.1-testing] x86: Reduce assertion aggressiveness in send_IPI_mask()., Xen patchbot-3.1-testing <=