WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-bugs

[Xen-bugs] [Bug 1301] Windows and Linux connection using PV Drivers cras

To: xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-bugs] [Bug 1301] Windows and Linux connection using PV Drivers crashes (bridge)
From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:03:04 -0700
Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 06:03:09 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <bug-1301-3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/bugzilla/>
List-help: <mailto:xen-bugs-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen Bugzilla <xen-bugs.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-bugs@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-bugs>, <mailto:xen-bugs-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-bugs>, <mailto:xen-bugs-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1301





------- Comment #11 from james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-07-21 06:03 -------
> After disabling checksum offload seens to be working fine now! It`s 
> transfering
> fast but when I want to transfer files with size lasrge than 700mb the 
> transfer
> time can not estimate correctly.

Is the estimate correct when you use the qemu drivers?

In doing some testing I have noticed that sometimes the xennet drivers perform
badly, like 1/10th of the normal performance. I think something is happening
that is causing packets to be corrupted or dropped, causing tcp to go into slow
restart. On a 10 second test this could have a big impact if it happens a few
times. Of course the rings filling up would cause this too.

> Can I help you with more information to detect why checksum offload is not
> working properly?

If you could do a packet trace (I recommend wireshark for this) with GSO
disabled and CSUM offload enabled (eg your failing configuration) and confirm
to me that packets are all <1500/1514 bytes it would be useful. I'm wondering
if GSO is staying enabled even if you disabled it. A packet much larger than
1500 bytes would indicate this. Disabling csum offload should make sure it is
never enabled so you may be masking the problem by disabling that.

Otherwise, I really need to see the packet that is killing samba... preferably
on the Linux side of things... that's going to be tricky to get though.

I might put some ASSERT statements in the code to detect for things that
shouldn't happen and see if they get tripped up....


-- 
Configure bugmail: 
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

_______________________________________________
Xen-bugs mailing list
Xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-bugs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>