[Xen-bugs] [Bug 564] New: xm list possibly has same problem as xm vcpu-list had...

[bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=564

           Summary: xm list possibly has same problem as xm vcpu-list had...
           Product: Xen
           Version: 3.0-testing
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Tools
        AssignedTo: xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
        ReportedBy: Shaun.Reitan@xxxxxxxxxxx


I recently submited bug id#545 that was resolved in unstable.  This is great 
seeing how now `xm vcpu-list` only takes about 1 second to run on a host with 
40 guests.  The problem i now see is that `xm list` on the same setup takes 3-5 
seconds to run and from the looks of it, it's displaying pretty much the same 
stuff that `xm vcpu-list` is showing...

vcpu-list shows the following catagorys
name,ID,VCPU,CPU,State,Time(s),CPU Affinity

while list shows the following catagorys
Name,ID,Mem(MiB),VCPUs,State,Time(s)

Obviously list will show much more information when --long is passed to it but 
if you look at the catagorys of both they are for the most part showing the 
same info (other than mem and vcpu).  Should it be taking 3-5 seconds to run on 
a idle host?!

-- 
Configure bugmail: 
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

_______________________________________________
Xen-bugs mailing list
Xen-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-bugs