 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-api
Re: [Xen-API] about XCP upgrade process
| To: | George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>, bquiroz.work@xxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-API] about XCP upgrade process |
| From: | Todd Deshane <todd.deshane@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:58:55 -0500 |
| Cc: | xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:00:20 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=GQ+mlHxZoTQRSgznb3CWQ/aa63rZpuYuEAkQS0GM1mA=; b=nSEQLztUuvTCA376d4ptNcYpLsQRZBMbBIwmpzJ8bnlCvLjMccj+FvwHCfl5w9QopB VDMi9bWsTTy9ZJ7iorDrCzjWUSL6Vb6P4dAcZHOlLFrbaNvkofMnhRmgq1RzeIjkXKoP SqZ+8NUYWZAc3Fv4pJms7XyByo1/8CPK1czOM= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=W3F4lKgllP3FUepn5TfN3LU/WshLZEwHYWfpfEzfhgxOzgpdwGd257VTaT6hHyvEwd /6K7uywo83F9mkgO+sz98nEZU/o4TmfNwDzpcgKi3wgleA8MU4BTHMmtT4SA9aY2WaDw ZNGG5Nvup/9Xdep3qmomHUu7l1uN+tVoDpBTI= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1293031565.2829.17.camel@mabase> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Discussion of API issues surrounding Xen <xen-api.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-api@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api>, <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api>, <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <AANLkTi=peUhBPruEGaKbx3eZKQ1Ja8b=dJe3XMJbPR6i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1293031565.2829.17.camel@mabase> |
| Sender: | xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:26 AM, George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As far as I know XCP 0.5 and 1.0 (not sure about 0.11 and 0.5) can not > exists together in single pool. > > Single way to upgrade I know involve full down for all hosts in pool - > configuration exported, host install from scratches with brand-new XCP > 1.0 and old configuration importing. But this cause some bugs with > duplicated templates and may be some other problems. > > Actually I really like to know way to upgrade XCP 0.5 pool to 1.0 > without full down. > Upgrading pools is supported by XenServer [1], so we should also be able to support it with XCP too. XCP 1.0 is still in beta and upgrading is not yet possible, but it is planned. yum install xcp (or similar) is also being discussed for future releases, stay tuned :) Hope that helps. Thanks, Todd [1] http://docs.vmd.citrix.com/XenServer/5.0.0/1.0/en_gb/installation.html#maintenance-updating_xs_40-vs_41 _______________________________________________ xen-api mailing list xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-API] XCP 1.0 Beta - Unable to create Windows 2008 R2 64 vm, Jon Ludlam |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-API] about XCP upgrade process, George Shuklin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-API] about XCP upgrade process, George Shuklin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-API] about XCP upgrade process, George Shuklin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
