| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-api
RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] Fix parsing of the tools .iso filename
> On 26/11/09 16:44, David Scott wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User David Scott<dave.scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > # Date 1259253843 0
> > # Node ID c512a7857329c62e8ba44bc76e70f1068a0d1abb
> > # Parent 6fd77ef2569ead1d2cbc5ca6a6d496519e966fc0
> > CA-35383: if the tools filename build number has a non-digit suffix,
> disregard it.
> >
> > XCP hosts currently have tools isos in
> > /opt/xensource/packages/iso/xs-tools-<version>-<build><suffix>.iso
> > where<build> is an integer and<suffix> is a string.
>
Magnus wrote:
> I think we'll continue to have the "old style" isos as well, ie both
>
> /opt/xensource/packages/iso/xs-tools.iso
> /opt/xensource/packages/iso/xs-tools-<ver>-<build><suffix>.iso
>
> would need to be handled. Right?
Good point -- my commit comment is misleading. The code change is actually just
to ignore the <suffix> in the case where <build><suffix> is present; it
shouldn't affect the 'regular' case when we have 'xs-tools.iso' or
'xs-tools-<ver>.iso'
I've got some notes on the filename convention used for the tools iso sitting
around. I'll try to tidy them up and stick them on the wiki.
Cheers,
Dave
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
|
|
|
| |
|
Home