|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen
Am Freitag, 11. November 2011, 13:59:53 schrieb J. Roeleveld:
> I have seperate configs for the different domUs. (They don't all do the
> same things and prefer to only enable what is really needed)
Yes, makes much sense in production...
> > CONFIG_XEN_BACKEND=y
> > CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_BACKEND=y
> > CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_TAP=y
>
> Is this one necessary when using LVM LVs for the partitions?
TAP is for file based disks only - BLKDEV_BACKEND should be required if want
to use LVM (phy).
> > CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_TX_SHIFT=8
>
> Not seen this one yet (or missed it). Guess I've got some reading/googling
> to do.
This is not completely clear to me and i would not put my hand in any fire for
it... I assume it relys to any kind of buffer / mapping within the network
stuff.
In openSuSe (just read that) these value seems changed to 10, others use 12
here - i just left the default for now as initially recommended by the
regarding xen code / patch writer.
I still have some strange TCP / networking problems with some older DomUs
after upgrading to 4.1.2 (from 3.4.3) - this may or may not related to this
setting.
> > CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND=y
> > CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND_VPCI=y
>
> Only when passing PCI-devices to domUs, right? :)
Yes, but did not worked with it yet (lack of time)...
> > CONFIG_XEN_TPMDEV_BACKEND=m
> > CONFIG_XEN_SCSI_BACKEND=y
> > CONFIG_XEN_USB_BACKEND=m
>
> These three, only when passing the devices to the domU?
Yes...
> > CONFIG_XEN_NETDEV_ACCEL_SFC_FRONTEND=m
>
> Need to read up on this, name sounds interesting.
...afair that only affects special network accel hardware (Solarflare NICs).
> > Yes (in Dom0).
>
> Ok, the documentation I found was contradictory on this point.
> What I found seemed to indicate that xl doesn't use xend and will work
> without xend running.
> But when using xm, xend is needed.
Ok, right, my fault...
this is new to me (work with 4.x just since some days now...).
As i just have some own older scriptwork relying on xm i need this at least
until i've ported them... If you work just with the new xl toolchain you did
not require xend any longer...Thanks for pointing me here...
cheers,
Niels.
--
---
Niels Dettenbach
Syndicat IT&Internet
http://www.syndicat.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, Simon Hobson
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, admin@xxxxxxx
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, J. Roeleveld
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, J. Roeleveld
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, Niels Dettenbach
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, J. Roeleveld
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, Niels Dettenbach
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, J. Roeleveld
- Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen,
Niels Dettenbach <=
Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, ray
|
|
|
|
|