xen-users
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 un
To: |
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error |
From: |
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 12:14:35 -0500 |
Cc: |
"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Walter Robert Ditzler <ditwal001@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:16:28 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1111081058060.3519@kaball-desktop> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1107201238440.12963@kaball-desktop> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAOJK0u4CH31Kl5v1RPAzyrZCgQAAEAAAAIMchHuG/6dIqtJ7GgPrsOEBAAAAAA==@xxxxxxxxx> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAOJK0u4CH31Kl5v1RPAzyrZCgQAAEAAAAAKIP0TTIelKl7OMHw7/aSQBAAAAAA==@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107251142270.12963@kaball-desktop> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAOJK0u4CH31Kl5v1RPAzyrZCgQAAEAAAAICr5HMuz3FOpEbmgui+XxgBAAAAAA==@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107251748160.12963@kaball-desktop> <20111103173837.GA21554@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1111071646210.3519@kaball-desktop> <20111107212619.GA24889@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1111081058060.3519@kaball-desktop> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 11:09:11AM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > XENBUS: Timeout connecting to device: device/vkbd/0 (local state 3,
> > > > remote state 1)
> > > > [which seems odds as the vkb from VNC looks to be working]
> > >
> > > Thanks for pointing this out: I enabled vkbd in upstream qemu but I
> > > forgot to do the same in qemu-xen so as a result you would get failures
> > > of this kind.
> >
> > Oh boy. Seems that there are a couple of issues here. It might be that the
> > timeout I had experienced was _only_ related to this and the other were
> > red-herrings.
> >
> > You might want to make sure M A Young and Stefan Bader are CC-ed on your
> > Xen 4.1.1
> > patch so they can pull it in.
>
> Actually I have just realized that the vkbd feature couldn't possibly
> have been backported to xen 4.1.1. In fact I didn't even add any vkbd
> devices for HVM guests in XL in xen-unstable yet.
> Of course this was to avoid situations like this one.
>
> So my guess is that when you use "vfb" in an HVM guest config file
> you cause xend to create a vkbd device that is without backend.
> A PV on HVM guest would try to connect to it but it wouldn't get any
> response back so it would timeout.
>
> The solution to this problem is to avoid using vfb in the config file. I
> strongly hope that the config file you showed us before is not generated
> by libvirt somehow. If it is we need to file a bug against libvirt.
And sure enough, if I modify the xm file libvirt creates to be:
[root@phenom ~]# diff /tmp/b.autogenerated /tmp/b
8c8
< boot = "c"
---
> boot = "dc"
20c20,21
< vfb = [ "type=vnc,vncunused=1" ]
---
> #vfb = [ "type=vnc,vncunused=1,keymap=en-us" ]
> vnc=1
It bootes right up. Is this a new behavior with xend? I would think
not - it just seems that the 'vfb' for HVM guests worked in the past -
as Windows boots just fine? And I think the accelerated drivers
for Windows take advantage of that?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <=
- Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk |
Next by Date: |
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Is: Xen 4.1.1, xend, HVM, 3.1 kernel; Was:Re: [Xen-devel] xen 4.2 unstable; HVM; 2.6.39.3; HD/Network card error, Stefano Stabellini |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|